On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:28 AM, David Herman wrote: > No pejorative overtones intended. We just don't yet have any decent > terminology for distinguishing the full ES.next front end from the > backwards-compatible one.
In the working draft of the specification I'm using "extended code" to mean the extended ES.next language constructors that will require opt-in access. I also redefine "strict code" to encompass both ES5 strict mode mode and extended code. Allen _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
