On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 16:54, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sep 30, 2011, at 12:22 AM, Erik Arvidsson wrote: >> ... >> A "static" keyword is at this point traditional, but we all hate it. >> Are we being too pure? >> /be > > I would also be fine with a special class body. > > I'm also fine with 'static'. Like everybody, I don't really like the > name but it is the best we have at the moment.
Personally, I would choose no support at all for class-side properties if the only other option was calling them "static". I find the use of that keyword for this meaning at least as objectionable as other have found, for example, optional commas after object literal methods. Allen _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
