François REMY wrote:
About the 'fn' proposal, I'm happy with it. Asking a 'use' statement
just for that feature may prove a little excessive but if it can be
merged with other can-be-breaking syntax reforms ('use es6'), why not.
But, seriously, what really makes it impossible to use # or @? Those
would have no compat issues, would require no header. Even if @ would be
used in private-name, it would be in a completely different context.
It's like the SQL guys who used '%' as wildchar [and may have used *].
True for @, but not so for #. The latter is used to specify freeze. That
is, you probably can write #@(x) {x+1}, but ##(x) {x+1} would be ridiculous.
François
Herby
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
