> As a starting point, would it make sense to provide an API that matches > Array.prototype methods (where applicable)?
I think this ties in to my earlier desire to make Array.prototype methods work with iterators in general [1]. That is, I think the correct way to do this would be: 1) To specify that "set is an iterator that, when iterated over, returns its values." 2) To specify that all iterators get (at least): every, filter, forEach, map, reduce, reduceRight, some One potential sticking point is that we might want filter and map to return sets themselves. [1]: https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2012-February/020356.html _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
