On Mar 3, 2012, at 6:54 AM, Dean Landolt wrote: > I like, though <+ is a little easier on the eyes.
Ambiguous. + is a unary operator. > One argument for the "wrong direction" being wrong: if A <: B is common math > syntax for A is a subtype of B, if you turn the arrow around it'd read A is a > supertype of B, and this is fairly close to what <| was trying to express. Yeah, that's one of the things I don't like about <:. Dave
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
