On Mar 23, 2012, at 12:42 AM, Claus Reinke wrote:
> - could we think of hoisting a class as hoisting its constructor
> (the hoisted binding wouldn't be undefined, but shouldn't be called
> before initialization, either)?
>
But its value could be accessed? It's properties could be accessed?
This would be a new kind of Temporal deal zone. I don't think we need it. Can
you show a use case were the current proposal (class X{} scopes just like
const X;) doesn't work.
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
