- could we think of hoisting a class as hoisting its constructor
This would be a new kind of Temporal deal zone. I don't think
we need it. Can you show a use case were the current proposal
(class X{} scopes just like const X;) doesn't work.
Thinko of mine, sorry. The reasoning was that
class X{ constructor(){} }
is short for
function X(){}
and should be hoisted a such. But with the .prototype properties,
it would be more like
class X{ constructor(){}; props }
is short for
{props} <| function X(){}
which doesn't work (nor does hoisting the constructor without
the .prototype properties), while
class X{ constructor(){}; props }
is short for
const X = {props} <| function (){}
does make all-or-nothing sense.
Claus
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
