> Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
>> My bad. It is, minus [[Construct]] and *.prototype. I misremembered how
>> bind() works.
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2012, at 0:01 , Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting. So x => x * x is not just syntactic sugar for
>>>
>>> function (x) { return x * x }.bind(this)
On Mar 31, 2012, at 2:54 , Brendan Eich wrote:
> We do not want to delegate to a target function that can [[Construct]],
> because there is no such target function -- we're not trying to sugar .bind
> on a full function. That is too expensive and general (no pre-args, no full
> function under the hood).
Ah, good. But one can use the above (pseudo-)desugaring to predict the behavior
of arrow functions, right? That is, there is no observable difference.
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
[email protected]
home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
