Oh, wait, just have read Crock's article on => functions. A Python's style of 
passing manual `this'? That's interesting (why it's not specified on the wiki? 
where Crockford took it from? did you discuss it in a close ECMA meeting?). 
Inconsistent again with other functions.

So, let's see, overall we have .. 6 types of functions in JS, and all have 
their own specific features. That's again interesting, if won't cause confusion.

Dmitry


On Apr 1, 2012, at 1:13 AM, Dmitry Soshnikov wrote:

> 
> On Apr 1, 2012, at 12:34 AM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
> 
>>>> Ah, good. But one can use the above (pseudo-)desugaring to predict the 
>>>> behavior of arrow functions, right? That is, there is no observable 
>>>> difference.
>>> 
>>> There is, again, the difference in terms of delegation to the target's 
>>> [[Construct]] in case of a bound function, see the spec ("bound" per ES5, 
>>> of course, since, as Brendan notices, it's not just a syntactic sugar, but 
>>> a new special type of functions).
>> 
>> OK. Ignoring [[Construct]] and .prototype, any other differences?
> 
> Well, "ES5-bounds" also do not have `prototype' property, but delegate to the 
> target's `prototype'. However, yes, there is the (main) difference in respect 
> of supporting TCP (if I understand correctly, since had no time to follow the 
> complete thread) -- return and break/continue jumps to the parent frame 
> instead of working with the function itself.
> 
> Lexical `this' is the only similar thing to bound functions, so we should not 
> call => functions as synonym to bound functions. You may say, => function _as 
> well as_ a bound captures `this' lexically, but in contrast with it, it has 
> other features.  In my later analysis, I'll specify them as a new type of 
> functions --  AF (Arrow Function) -- in addition to FE, FD, NFE, BF, etc., 
> with many own features, but not just a syntactic sugar -- neither for FE, nor 
> for BF.
> 
> Dmitry
> 

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to