Yes, I'm about to bail back to ??.
Issue of undefined vs. undefined-or-null is separate but I'm still
favoring undefined only.
/be
John Tamplin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Rick Waldron <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I realize that the strawman currently spells it "?:", consider
this message an opposition to that.
This has been an extension to C for quite some time, and it means
specifically to use the condition value if it is truthy (and is itself
derived from the behavior of a ? a : b). I think it would be a
mistake to change that behavior from what is expected.
--
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
