Herby Vojčík wrote:
I feel there is objection to introduce magical [[NullPatternObject]] into language, but all of CS-style soft-accesses could be solved very cleanly and consistently.
No, because (a) the overhead of a new object is too high; (b) with any kind of suffix-? or suffix-.? as you proposed it would be observable that you get a new object instead of short-circuiting to undefined -- the new object is exposed in the language.
/be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
