On Sep 27, 2012, at 9:45 AM, David Bruant <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...this is how I discovered that, in non-strict mode, it's possible to
> define a function where 2 arguments have the same name...
>
> Le 27/09/2012 18:19, Allen Wirfs-Brock a écrit :
>> Consider
>>
>> function f(a, b=a, a=3, c=a) {
> The most positive adjective I can find to describe this like is:
> "confusing".
> If I'm ever in a team where a dev writes such a line, I will kill this
> dev with my bare hands :-)
> When writing 'c=a', what was the intention of the developer? Maybe the
> third arg has been renamed to 'a' by mistake during a refactoring,
> introducing a subtle bug.
>
> When using the same argument name several times with default values,
> what about throwing an SyntaxError at parse time regardless of
> strictness? It would follow what's been done with strict mode.
I actually like this, it simplifies the semantics if you say using default
arguments disallows duplicate names. This I think is a livable restriciton as
allowing duplicate arguments is basically just a backwards compat feature (so
obviously doesn't effect code using defaults).
I kind of like the idea of disallowing shadowing of argument names if defaults
are used as well, but I'm not sure if that would be as low risk to
comprehension of behaviour.
--Oloier
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
