> Yes, although I don't take the "private, who needs it?" attitude as easily > as you do. Not saying it's wrong, but I'm not 100% convinced yet. >
In a way I'm posing a challenge - I think it will be an interesting debate to have. Doesn't this have the same problem you were arguing against in your > previous message, that if you want to import 37 names, you have to name > them all individually? > Sure, if we were inclined to import 37 names, but I don't think that will be the pattern. Look at current usage of "underscored" property names. Their usage is mostly confined to a single site (usually a class). Only occasionally will you find an underscored property name whose semantic origin is non-local (usually in class hierarchies). Kevin
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
