Have to say I agree with Kevin and Yehuda here, on implicit declaration
(not export or import) being better. Not saying I'm sold on the whole
idea, but I feel the pain.
The module-wide scope is pretty much Dart. Anyone using Dart much want
to comment on how that's worked out?
/be
Yehuda Katz wrote:
Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
For the case of importing "37" at-names, I would expect that *
imports would take care of it:
import * from ModuleDefining37NameInterface;
Oh, come on!
The problem isn't importing the names. The problem lies in having
to maintain a nightmarishly long set of declarations which are
**completely internal to the module**, not exported and not imported.
This is essentially the problem I had when I tried to port existing
code. It was especially annoying because it was easy to forget to
create and maintain the declarations.
The more I think about it, the more I think that scoping symbols to
modules would work well. Does that mean symbols are simply disallowed
outside of modules?
Kevin
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
