There seems to be some confusion here, because we've chosen the second alternative. Can you point to where you got the other impression?
Sam On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I can't seem to remember or find the rationale behind lazy (interleaved) > execution of external modules. For example: > > // x.js > console.log("inside x"); > export var x; > > // y.js > console.log("inside y"); > import x from "x.js"; > > With lazy execution, loading "y.js" would produce: > > > inside y > > inside x > > The alternative would be to execute dependencies prior to executing the > requested module: > > > inside x > > inside y > > What was the rationale for choosing the first alternative? > > Thanks! > > { Kevin } > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
