On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> > >> I'm not sure what prior critique you're referring to. > > > > > > Quite a while ago, I pointed out that concatenation would be difficult > with > > nested modules, but I was operating under the assumption of interleaved > > execution: https://gist.github.com/zenparsing/3892979 > > I think this transformation demonstrates why I prefer our current > approach more than nested modules. See my fork at > https://gist.github.com/samth/5355676 The correct translation using nested modules (with the proper topological execution order semantics), would be more like this: https://gist.github.com/zenparsing/5355927 I don't particularly want to have this discussion yet another time, > I don't remember having this discussion on es-discuss. Not that it's a requirement or anything... > but (a) lexical modules as in our original design did not serve all > the required use cases > Given that bundling is possible with nested modules, I'm not sure what other use cases `module "name"` is serving. I'll look back through the use case presentation, though. { Kevin }
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
