> > 2) The execution order is then just a topological sort of the dependency
> > graph, breaking cycles where appropriate. Is that correct?
>
> Yes. Cycles are broken by reference to the order in which the
> relevant imports appear in the source of the importing module.
>
Mmmm...
In that case, I believe we can use nested (lexical) modules for
concatenation, and my previous critique doesn't hold. To bundle some root
module R, we create a topological sort of R's dependencies, assign a unique
identifier to each dependency, and replace occurrences of module specifier
strings with the appropriate module identifier.
Does that sound right, or am I missing some point or use case?
{ Kevin }
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
