Brian Di Palma wrote:
Another mail that I expected to receive more attention that hasn't...
For some reason my mail program doesn't thread your reply to my o.p.
Here it is in the archive, FWIW:
https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2013-April/029969.html
We're London based so we had attendants at JQueryUK and the announcement of
private class state in ES6 was a surprise, a pleasant one but still surprising.
Is it the case that the announcement was jumping the gun?
Rembmer, my words were that "I threw up a sketch" -- not a final
masterpiece, not the Mona Lisa.
However as your meeting notes excerpts show, we still don't quite have
consensus on classes _per se_, without including private syntax in ES6.
This is an agenda item for the upcoming TC39 meeting. We should try to
build on the work by Mark and Tom at
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:relationships
and make progress, whether that work ends up in ES6 or ES7 for
prudential reasons.
Needless to say for programming with large code bases it would be
excellent to have private state.
Agreed!
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
