We clearly don't quite have consensus, as your interaction at that meeting helped highlight. I'd like to restore consensus, not break it.

What goes into a particular edition of ECMA-262 is less important than making progress on draft emerging-consensus specs for private-in-class, prototype-implemeting, and developer-testing them.

Doing nothing raises the risk of a larger consensus break, but that's the least of it. Doing nothing underserves developers and tends to defer too much thinking about private syntax that we should be doing sooner rather than later.

/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to