On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> 0. If we have an absolute URL, skip steps 1-3. >> >> How do you define this? We currently do not have this concept really. >> You could parse and compare if the serialization is equivalent I >> suppose, but even that would fail to detect certain cases, such as >> http://test/test\test ... Or http:test which is an absolute URL in >> theory, but treated identical to "test" if the base URL's scheme is >> http. > > If it's a URI, then it's treated this way. That is, if it starts > 'scheme:' for some scheme.
I think what you're failing to understand is that there's no concept as "if it's a URI" within the context of the web platform, so I'm asking how you'd thought about going about defining that new concept. Maybe seeing what I meant in action will help: http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?%3C!DOCTYPE%20html%3E%3Cimg%20src%3Dhttp%3Aimage%3E -- http://annevankesteren.nl/ _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
