On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> 0. If we have an absolute URL, skip steps 1-3. >>> >>> How do you define this? We currently do not have this concept really. >>> You could parse and compare if the serialization is equivalent I >>> suppose, but even that would fail to detect certain cases, such as >>> http://test/test\test ... Or http:test which is an absolute URL in >>> theory, but treated identical to "test" if the base URL's scheme is >>> http. >> >> If it's a URI, then it's treated this way. That is, if it starts >> 'scheme:' for some scheme. > > I think what you're failing to understand is that there's no concept > as "if it's a URI" within the context of the web platform, so I'm > asking how you'd thought about going about defining that new concept.
What URLs remain the same after relative resolution against any other URL? > Maybe seeing what I meant in action will help: > http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?%3C!DOCTYPE%20html%3E%3Cimg%20src%3Dhttp%3Aimage%3E > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
