From: Jason Orendorff [[email protected]] > Here's what you would do under the proposal: > > ```js > // import a module in the same package/project > import "./controllers" as controllers; > > // import some other package > import "backbone" as backbone; > ``` > > The surface syntax deliberately follows Node. The first import is relative > and the second is absolute, within the tree of module names (not URLs; > neither of those module names is a URL).
That is not my understanding of Sam's message at https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2013-May/030553.html. Following those steps for `"backbone"` would, according to that message, 1. Split the module name on "/", url-encode, and re-join (yielding `"backbone"`). 2. Append ".js" to the module name (yielding `"backbone.js"`). 3. Use the URL parser with the base URL to produce an absolute URL (yielding `"http://example.com/path/to/base/backbone.js"`). 4. Pass the absolute URL to the fetch hook. _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
