Actually, I found some notes ( https://github.com/rwldrn/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2013-07/july-23.md, thanks).
The consensus is there only to not ToObject(RHS). Seems refutable/irrefutable feature still is not agreed? Dmitry On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi, > > Destructuring assignment (aka "non-strict pattern matching") seems was in > the draft spec for a while. > > I'm currently implementing the feature in our local code transforms > pipeline, and it seemed to me that there is/was already a pretty stable > agreement on it. > > Currently what I see is: irrefutable match with default values (plus, > spread/rest for arrays). However, I was informed that on the last meeting > the topic was raised again and the refutable/irrefutable aspects where > brought to the discussion again. > > (it seems like this "refutable/irrefutable" thing was here for couple of > years already) > > I wanted to clarify the current status, how active the topic is, was the > consensus achieved before, and how likely the current semantics will be > changed? > > Thanks, > Dmitry >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
