On Aug 2, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov wrote: > Actually, I found some notes > (https://github.com/rwldrn/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2013-07/july-23.md, > thanks). > > The consensus is there only to not ToObject(RHS). Seems refutable/irrefutable > feature still is not agreed? > > Dmitry >
that's pretty much it. The RHS ToObjects need to be removed. Other than that and bugs fixes, I think the spec. as it appears in the Rev16 draft is pretty solid. Please do implement and report any apparent spec bugs. Allen > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov <[email protected]> > wrote: > Hi, > > Destructuring assignment (aka "non-strict pattern matching") seems was in the > draft spec for a while. > > I'm currently implementing the feature in our local code transforms pipeline, > and it seemed to me that there is/was already a pretty stable agreement on it. > > Currently what I see is: irrefutable match with default values (plus, > spread/rest for arrays). However, I was informed that on the last meeting the > topic was raised again and the refutable/irrefutable aspects where brought to > the discussion again. > > (it seems like this "refutable/irrefutable" thing was here for couple of > years already) > > I wanted to clarify the current status, how active the topic is, was the > consensus achieved before, and how likely the current semantics will be > changed? > > Thanks, > Dmitry > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
