On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Aug 2, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov wrote: > > Actually, I found some notes ( > https://github.com/rwldrn/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2013-07/july-23.md, > thanks). > > The consensus is there only to not ToObject(RHS). Seems > refutable/irrefutable feature still is not agreed? > > Dmitry > > > that's pretty much it. The RHS ToObjects need to be removed. Other than > that and bugs fixes, I think the spec. as it appears in the Rev16 draft is > pretty solid. Please do implement and report any apparent spec bugs. > > > OK, cool, thanks for the info, Allen. Dmitry. > > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Destructuring assignment (aka "non-strict pattern matching") seems was in >> the draft spec for a while. >> >> I'm currently implementing the feature in our local code transforms >> pipeline, and it seemed to me that there is/was already a pretty stable >> agreement on it. >> >> Currently what I see is: irrefutable match with default values (plus, >> spread/rest for arrays). However, I was informed that on the last meeting >> the topic was raised again and the refutable/irrefutable aspects where >> brought to the discussion again. >> >> (it seems like this "refutable/irrefutable" thing was here for couple of >> years already) >> >> I wanted to clarify the current status, how active the topic is, was the >> consensus achieved before, and how likely the current semantics will be >> changed? >> >> Thanks, >> Dmitry >> > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
