The only formatting requirement for the stack property is that if it is present, it must be a string.
—Oliver On Nov 12, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Erik Arvidsson <[email protected]> wrote: > When I started investigating this I had the hope that stack could be > standardized. However, the format of the string is cannot be changed without > breaking the web so the way forward is to introduce a new property name. But > since we are introducing a new property name we should return structured data > instead of a plain old string. > > I haven't had the time to work on this since my initial analysis of the state > of the stack property. > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:51 PM, John Barton <[email protected]> wrote: > Note that in Chrome the devtools are remote and error.stack is a getter which > issues a remote method call to the backend. Only when the stack property is > accessed will the internal representation be converted to a string. Anything > else is too expensive. > > A plain JS object format would be much more useful for development tools > developers. > > jjb > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > > > -- > erik > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
