Righto, filed https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124220
—Oliver On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW, the code I linked to, which arv refers to, when it finds itself on SM, > normalizes the SM error stack string to approx v8's format. But the more > important part of the answer is the parsed form provided by getCWStack. > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Oliver Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > Righto, do we know whether Carakan/V8’s text or SM’s text is preferred? > > Currently it seems like JSC’s is a little bit weird compare to others, and as > i’ve said earlier i’m happy to change it to match another engine (we all have > the same info in varying ways, so we can all technically produce the same > view in our .stack string) > > —Oliver > > On Nov 12, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Erik Arvidsson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Oliver Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> The only formatting requirement for the stack property is that if it is >> present, it must be a string. >> >> No. There is a lot of code out there that parses this string and depend on >> the format. >> >> >> See Mark's reply for one such case. >> >> >> —Oliver >> >> On Nov 12, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Erik Arvidsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> When I started investigating this I had the hope that stack could be >>> standardized. However, the format of the string is cannot be changed >>> without breaking the web so the way forward is to introduce a new property >>> name. But since we are introducing a new property name we should return >>> structured data instead of a plain old string. >>> >>> I haven't had the time to work on this since my initial analysis of the >>> state of the stack property. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:51 PM, John Barton <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Note that in Chrome the devtools are remote and error.stack is a getter >>> which issues a remote method call to the backend. Only when the stack >>> property is accessed will the internal representation be converted to a >>> string. Anything else is too expensive. >>> >>> A plain JS object format would be much more useful for development tools >>> developers. >>> >>> jjb >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> erik >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >> >> >> >> -- >> erik > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > > > -- > Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain > > Cheers, > --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
