Oh I must have missed that, never mind then thanks Axel for pointing out.
Regards -- Irakli Gozalishvili Web: http://www.jeditoolkit.com/ On Wednesday, 2013-11-20 at 03:22 , Axel Rauschmayer wrote: > > +1 on arrowed generators! Have being actively using generators last month & > > have being wishing they could be like arrows, although syntax I've being > > thinking of was > > > > (x, y) *> { .... } > > > > BTW given that generators are used as a method on iterators wouldn't it > > make sense to consider syntax for generator members in a classes syntax ?? > > It’s already in the spec: > https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-generator-function-definitions > > My hope is in ES6 we would just use class syntax for methods & arros for > > functions making "function" a legacy > > My hope, too. > -- > Dr. Axel Rauschmayer > a...@rauschma.de (mailto:a...@rauschma.de) > > home: rauschma.de (http://rauschma.de/)twitter: twitter.com/rauschma > (http://twitter.com/rauschma) > blog: 2ality.com (http://2ality.com/) > > > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
