http://bugs.ecmascript.org/ -- please use it, you will be amazed at how
quickly the bug is resolved. Thanks,
/be
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
If TC39 said ECMA-404 is going to be replaced by a verbatim copy of the
ABNF grammar in draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-08 with pretty much no other
discussion of JSON and a clear indication that future editions will not
add such discussion, and will not change the grammar without IETF con-
sensus, I would be willing to entertain the idea of making ECMA-404 a
normative reference.
How soon would TC39 be able to make such a decision and publish a re-
vised edition of ECMA-404 as described above?
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
