On Dec 10, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> ...
> If things had gone according to plan, it seems likely that Ecma would
> have requested the IANA registration for application/json jointly lists
> the IETF and Ecma International has holding Change Control over it, and
> it seems unlikely there would have been much disagreement about that.
>
> It is normal to award change control to other organisations, for
> instance, RFC 3023 gives change control for the XML media types to the
> W3C. I can look up examples for jointly held change control if that
> would help.
Speaking of media types. I just noticed that RFC 4329 seems painfully out of
date WRT application/ecmascript and application/javascript and the langauge
specification that defines the payload.
Perhaps this is another area that needs coordination.
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
