David Bruant wrote:
Le 29/12/2013 01:48, Brendan Eich a écrit :
David Bruant wrote:
it's somewhat ironic that Array carries 'from' given it's the only
"class" that doesn't need it per case study for 3) above :-)
But Array is the return type.
It's always the return type of Array.from(x), but not the return type
of Array.from.call(Whatever, x).
Of course, but why is this a problem for the name? Collection.from for
Collection extends Array carries the same connotation.
Let's stick to real problems! The name is not a problem, AFAICT.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
