On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Dec 31, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > > David Bruant wrote: > > ... > > > I haven't had a use for a .reduce yet, but maybe that would make sense too? > > > Are Sets ordered just because for-of says so? :-P > > > Actually, according to the spec. they are ordered, but this is only > currently observable via for-of. > And the existing .forEach, right? Rick
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
