On Jan 19, 2014, at 6:03 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
>
> I'm inclined to say this has missed the train for ES6.
>
> That may be fine. It seems like we would use a little more experience with
> ES6 modules before we tackle this.
>
> Definitely. It appears that the only thing in the ES6 draft which mentions
> standard modules is GeneratorFunction. Will that be specified as a property
> of the global object in the next draft
It isn't clear that there much need for a global name for GeneratorFunction.
If you really eed to access it can always get it via:
(function *() {}).constructor
(as the always helful generator UMO diagram at
http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-generatorfunction-objects
tells us)
The two names that I think are still up in the air (as to whether they are
globals) are Realm and Loader
Allen_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
