On Jan 20, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
>> It isn't clear that there much need for a global name for GeneratorFunction.
>> If you really eed to access it can always get it via:
>>
>> (function *() {}).constructor
>
> Does this present a hazard for CSP, which provides policy controls governing
> Function?
Does CSP deal with (function(){}).constructor ?
CSP probably does needs to deal with this, as well as user defined subclasses
of function (that super call the Function constructor).
Also assorted new ways of compiling/evaluating code from strings introduced by
Module Loaders
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
