2014-06-29 0:58 GMT+02:00 Kevin Smith <[email protected]>: > Static checking will be limited anyway. If you want to go this way you >> should use typescript. >> >> > That's the point that I'm trying to make, shops will choose other > languages that provide more static information. We should be thinking > about expanding the user base and ensuring that JS is a viable option years > down the road. >
> >> CommonJS falls a bit short on the import side because static analysis of >> require calls is brittle. A special language syntax would enable a robust >> static analysis of dependencies. >> > > If you don't have static exports, then how are you going to know if what > you import is valid? You can't, without executing the program. > > M
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
