.... Yeah I guess I'm pretty late for that huh... No this is great, the more feature, the better. A lot of these feature would cause certain application not to be needed... In other words, use more of the language and less libraries.... Why you at it, how about reviving E4X? That way, we can lose the DOM api. After all, if ES was made for the web, than there should be method to access the DOM. It could be an object, like how the E4X was, but better.
On another note, this is now becoming the mini-type application/JavaScript, than text/JavaScript. But consider the E4X though. E-S4L N-S4L > On Sep 10, 2014, at 9:35 AM, "Sebastian Zartner" <sebastianzart...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I don't see why you're complaining. If you don't like the features in ES6, > then just don't use them. The features of ES5 are still available. > If you want to have more strict code, then add a "use strict"; statement to > your code. > And if you're against adding more features to the core language, then you > should have complained several years ago at the planning of ES6. > > Sebastian > >> On 10 September 2014 08:12, L2L 2L <emanuelal...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> This.... These feature--most of them-- would be something I see in the >> browser api... This is truly looking like w3c working group... >> >> ... But I don't see any chance of my words changing the direction of the >> spec.... Especially when you consider the original designer of the language >> steering this course... >> >> So in term, if you can't beat them, change them, might as well aid them >> --in what I feel to be In truth, the destruction of the original syntax, by >> the original creature of the language... Kinda wish they had a flag for >> these new syntax to be set... At least than, those who are toward the >> originally syntax style, would feel some sort of preservation for it-- >> In their quest to farther add on to ES as a --application-- language. >> >> --as duo to a private email by /be. This to me is not trolling, I'm >> responding to this person who respond two times to my post... So in terms, I >> should not have to worry about being banned from the mailing list cause of >> this message. >> >> E-S4L >> N-S4L >> >> On Sep 10, 2014, at 1:17 AM, "Axel Rauschmayer" <a...@rauschma.de> wrote: >> >>>> Now is second half of 2014, and lots of issues are not closed yet, from >>>> what I see. >>> >>> The spec already looks pretty complete to me and Traceur and TypeScript do >>> a pretty good job of letting you use ES6 today. >>> >>> As previously announced here, the current schedule is to be finished by the >>> end of the year, to start the publication process in March 2014 and to have >>> a standard by June 2014. >>> >>>> I got delusioned as well. >>>> >>>> Isn't the model of big new editions of spec over; in the times we live >>>> now, with two-week frequent releases? I think ES6 will never see the light >>>> when taken from this approach. That's why, shouldn't the release policy be >>>> changed so that: >>> >>> It has already changed, but not for ES6. ECMAScript 7 and later will have >>> fixed release dates. Only features that are ready at a given date will be >>> included. >>> Background: https://github.com/tc39/ecma262 >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Axel Rauschmayer >>> a...@rauschma.de >>> rauschma.de >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> es-discuss@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
