On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 4:17 AM Leon Arnott <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> If you want both a TCP-able from and a local (most closely enclosing >> callable thing) form then the later should also presumably also be >> applicable at the top level of functions. >> >> The 'in' meta property prefix in combination with the 'function' prefix >> could do that job: >> >> > One thing I feel about meta-properties is that they really should have > some connection to the keyword's normal meaning, as is true of new.target. > "in" currently exclusively refers to inherited property access, both as an > operator and as a for-in keyword, and repurposing it to mean "invocation" > when there's a meta-property attached is, well, not something I'd be proud > of explaining. > Strong agreement here. If `in` grows meta properties, they should by relevant to what the `in` operator does (which may mean none at all). Rick
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
