On Feb 27, 2015, at 8:00 AM, Rick Waldron wrote: > > I was thinking exactly this while I was reading Allen's post. > > Would class method definitions use `class.*`? Seems like the wrong > abstraction..? Maybe all functions and method definitions use `function`, > while arrows use `=>` (or whatever) to preserve correspondence to possible > outer function?
the point here is that they are all "functions", regardless of how they are declared. When we write foo(), we don't care whether 'foo' is was declared using a function declaration, or a concise method, or class, or arrow syntax. We only care that it is a "function" which is an object that can be 'called' with an argument list. That is the exact sense that the word 'function' should be interpreted for those proposed meta properties. Allen
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
