Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
but how would you drop that listener, if that's even a concern of yours, beside the usage of `function`?
I'm not addressing your particular issue just yet -- patience!
Does "I agree with Mark" means already two think arrows function should never be self-reference-able?
No, again, I'm objecting to Allen's just-so story that `function` in an arrow refers to the arrow, and agreeing with Mark that the pellucid meaning (if there is one) would be the TCP one: the enclosing function around the arrow (if there is a function).
We need to get to the bottom of this to make progress, in any case. I don't think we should jump to `=>.self` for arrows and `function.self` for functions, although that is an obvious "patch" to resolve the conflict. Patching to split forms and "do both" is often the wrong thing.
/be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
