On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:53 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Mark S. Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you ever test that the object returned by `Promise#timeout(n)` is > something other than a plain promise? > > Responded on the other thread. > > Let's keep this one focused on: do we need to tweak the definitions of > `Promise.all` and `Promise.race` as they relate to species, and if so: how? > > Option 1: don't consult species at all; Option 2: use species for > intermediate results, but don't use species for final result; Option 3: you > tell me! > > Since I'm personally rationalizing away the current behavior as grody but > acceptable, I'm particularly interested in hearing "me, toos" (via private > email to me or Allen) if you think we should make a change. > --scott
I agree that the current behavior is "grody, but acceptable" for Promise.all and Promise.race However, I think that Promise.reject should parallel Promise.resolve and hence it should not use species. Allen
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
