On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Ehrenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this proposal is currently at Stage 0, right? Right. It is stage 0. > Do we typically > put Stage 0 proposals on the TC39 GitHub? My understanding was that > proposals typically get moved after Stage 2. > Typically yes. My assumption is that our desire here was one way -- we want to ensure it is on the (tc39) hub once it is at stage 2. I was assuming there was no issue in the opposite direction, i.e., that we do not actively want to ensure that it is or is not on the hub prior to stage 2. Perhaps I misunderstood. Is there anything about this in our process docs or prior discussions? Certainly, if for some reason we wish to ensure that earlier proposals are not on the hub, it would be easy to move off, and then back on later. This has a cost in broken links. What is the compensating benefit? > > Dan > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Dean Tribble <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have posted a stage 1 proposal for weak references in ES7 for your > perusal > > and feedback. > > > > https://github.com/tc39/proposal-weakrefs.git > > > > Thanks to Mark Miller and the authors of earlier proposals for help with > the > > document and content! Finally thanks to a few intrepid early reviewers > for > > their edits, comments, and feedback. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > es-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
