> > I have no problem with that, but do wonder, why? What is the downside of >> proposals being on the tc39 hub starting at an earlier stage, if the >> authors are so inclined? The upside is fewer broken links. >> > Because having the tc39 "brand" on things sends a signal to the broader community about the future state of ecma262?
Also, github forwards URLs when the repo is transferred, so we're good there. Case in point: https://github.com/zenparsing/async-iteration >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
