On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have no problem with that, but do wonder, why? What is the downside of >>> proposals being on the tc39 hub starting at an earlier stage, if the >>> authors are so inclined? The upside is fewer broken links. >>> >> > Because having the tc39 "brand" on things sends a signal to the broader > community about the future state of ecma262? > Makes sense. > > Also, github forwards URLs when the repo is transferred, so we're good > there. Case in point: https://github.com/zenparsing/async-iteration > >> Cool! I did not know that. -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
