Hi Bergi! If you read the description, it clearly says unofficial proposal, of which draft means a mock-up for improvement. I thought that was retorical enough for people to understand, I'll change that up.
Wierd. Was having this discussion / pep-talk with Brendan Eich and think he understood that fairly.( https://twitter.com/ev1stensberg/status/722180638971936768) About lack of answer in the reason, you should read the Medium article again, and reconsider what I said about ambiguously written code. I think it provides a clear intent, of which we want to avoid re-writing an assignment in order to use the logical OR. I advice you to read this on MDN <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Reflect> which explains what I mean about "not an object" . ( It's a built-in object) Where you need to assign it through a object assignment. And yea, the name was intentional. What makes this somewhat similar to `Object.create` is that we create an logical instance, but not an actual object like `Object.create` does. If you look at the issue tracker I want this to be viable with AND operators as well, so change of name is something I'd be up for! ( Also, if you got a proposal, I'd like to hear). Is there anything else I missed? Even On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Bergi <[email protected]> wrote: > even stensberg wrote: > > I wrote up a draft about how I'd like this to look at: >> https://github.com/ev1stensberg/proposal-reflect-or >> > > I'm sorry for the harsh tone, but that's not a draft. > > I tried to read [your medium post]( > https://medium.com/@ev1stensberg/iteration-in-javascript-needs-a-tectonic-shift-a74b6554bbd7) > but failed to understand anything (and didn't get any point you were going > to make). As such, the "Reason" for this proposal is completely missing to > me. > > While I fail to understand what your proposal is all about, it seems to > have something to do with defaulting values. And great, you've even asked > the question "How is this different to Default Param in ES6 / the OR > operator?" yourself in that text - but there is no answer?! > > The next thing that completely escaped me is your API description > > | `Reflect.create(target, value, [DefaultValue])` > | > | Creates a Reflect, which is not an object. > > Uh, what? What is "a Reflect"? > > > And the first thing that came to my mind after I read what you're talking > about is that you should rename the proposal. `Reflect.create` will remind > everyone of `Object.create` (given that some of the methods are duplicated > between `Object` and `Reflect`) and one would expect that they do the same > or at least have a similar purpose. > You seem to be proposing something completly different that has nothing to > do with creation. > > Kind regards, > Bergi > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
