Everything about this is confusing; you should slow down and think things through more.
R. On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:25 AM, even stensberg <[email protected]> wrote: > That's one of the reasons why GitHub is a better place to discuss this ;) > > As I tried to say, this is work in progress, meaning I'd like input on > this as well as improvements on the actual proposal. > > As by last line, what is it that you don't understand? Hit me up at GitHub > and I'll try to clear things up. > > For future discussions, I'd like to keep things such as this on GitHub, so > if you got any replies you want to take, do it there. > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Bergi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> … was bad typed by me there. >>> >> >> Indeed it was. >> >> I tried to explain why I >>> mean that this isn't a real object by saying that it doesn't contain >>> prototype or constructor and thereby people got the analogy. Often when I >>> say things are not things, as by object is not objects, I assume people >>> manage to reason without having to pin facts straight into their faces. >>> >> >> Sorry, but this approach isn't going to work on this mailing list here or >> when you are going to write a technical document like a spec proposal. >> Don't talk in (bad) metaphors, state facts and use precise language. >> >> We still don't understand how your `Reflect.create` is supposed to work >> or be implemented, how it is different from the old approach, and what >> exactly its advantage(s) will be. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Bergi >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
