Hi Even!

Wierd. Was having this discussion / pep-talk with Brendan Eich and think he
understood that fairly.(
https://twitter.com/ev1stensberg/status/722180638971936768)

Thanks for that link, but while Brendan Eich seemed to agree with the idea that *something* had to be done about defaulting declarations, he also showed some confusion about your ideas. Btw, that gist you linked (https://gist.github.com/ev1stensberg/883fd67da9809c84c08b84982e74148a) seems to be broken now.

About lack of answer in the reason, you should read the Medium article
again, and reconsider what I said about ambiguously written code. I think
it provides a clear intent, of which we want to avoid re-writing an
assignment in order to use the logical OR.

Yes, I did reread the article. I know that there are many wrongs about

| var value = value || "another value";

but I failed to understand which ones you mean. By "avoid re-writing an assignment" you refer to the duplication/repetition of the variable name? And what is ambiguous about this code? It's purpose is well-known, it's behaviour is well-defined, and after all it's a common JS idiom.

In the medium post you seemed to propose a new "declare" keyword that could replace the repeated variable name, and that keyword would magically resolve the the contextual variable if I understand correctly. OK, regardless of what I think about this idea (too verbose, too implicit), what does this have to do with your `Reflect.create` proposal?

I advice you to read this on MDN
<https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Reflect>
which
explains what I mean about "not an object" . ( It's a built-in object)

Uh, `Reflect` is still an object if that's what you refer to here.
Maybe what you actually wanted is to introduce a new Specification Type that works similar to a Reference?

Where you need to assign it through a object assignment. And yea, the name
was intentional. What makes this somewhat similar to `Object.create` is
that we create an logical instance, but not an actual object like
`Object.create` does.

Sorry, you lost me here again.

 Bergi

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to