It's a fair point, i assume the usage would be like if the property exists then ignore thenable behaviour and if it is falsy then none of any of this behaviour would occur, so a Module Namespace Object could have like [whateverSymbolName]: null, if thats sorta what you are proposing?
On 2018-04-14 13:11:34, Michael Theriot wrote: > A hypothetical proposal addressing that would intersect with this. > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 2:01 PM, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I don't understand why you would expect that, can you explain a bit > more? > > -Gus > > On 14 Apr 2018 10:53, Michael Theriot <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Currently 'then' is effectively a reserved key and I'd expect > any extension that allows the language to ignore it likewise > include a means of changing the key entirely. > > On Apr 12, 2018, at 9:33 PM, Gus Caplan <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hello all, > > In an effort to curtail the interesting behavior of > Promise.resolve (especially > with regard to dynamic import), I have created a proposal > for a well-known > symbol which will allow an object to not be treated as a > "thenable." > > I am privy to the current protocol proposal which might be a > better fit for > this, but due to dynamic import already being stage 3, I > don't feel we should > wait for it to come to fruition. > > Comments and suggestions are of course quite welcome at the > repo [1]. > > Thanks, > -Gus > > [1]: https://github.com/devsnek/proposal-symbol-thenable > <https://github.com/devsnek/proposal-symbol-thenable> > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> > > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

