Not a rule. Just an email to this board. On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:26 AM Григорий Карелин <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm new to this community, so I'd appreciate if you clarify: is that your > opinion or is it kind of rule written somewhere? > > чт, 30 мая 2019 г. в 09:59, guest271314 <[email protected]>: > >> > Wouldn't it be better to consolidate the decision? I mean as OP I vote >> for `from`, but if majority will say they better like `x.{y, z}` I'll take >> it. >> >> No. There should not be any prohibition as to the additions different >> solutions to a single proposal. Neither proposal is "better" right now as >> neither have been coded, tested, and if necessary, specified. A simple >> majority does not mean correct or complete. The more approaches available >> the more ability to compose the code from different perspectives, >> outputting the same result; expanding the language both in syntax and reach >> as to possible composition, without setting an arbitrary specification to a >> single majority at only this point in time. >> >> The tersest have been able to achieve so far on a single line using an >> immediately invoked arrow function and object rest which requires writing >> the identifier twice. >> >> If part of the requirement for the proposal is terse code, following the >> pattern of an immediately invoked arrow function if ```=``` operator >> between expressions ```()``` the arrow `>` and return value could be >> omitted as being designated implicit immediately invoked arrow function >> with default return value set from the destructured parameters, or >> ```undefined``` set as value of target identifiers, or plain object >> ```{}```, resulting in the syntax, within at least an object literal, >> possibly preceded by spread syntax, will result in >> >> ```let obj = {otherData:'other >> data',...(({firstName,lastName})=(user.profile)}``` >> >> being equivalent to >> >> ```let obj = {otherData:'other >> data',...(({firstName,lastName})=>({firstName,lastName}))(user.profile)}``` >> >> >> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 6:38 AM Григорий Карелин <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Wouldn't it be better to consolidate the decision? I mean as OP I vote >>> for `from`, but if majority will say they better like `x.{y, z}` I'll take >>> it. >>> >>> чт, 30 мая 2019 г. в 06:35, guest271314 <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> > I think it's possible to find someone who will represent the will of >>>> community. >>>> >>>> Individuals can compose the code right now. >>>> >>>> > At the moment the question is does community have will to add >>>> proposed sugar to the language, and if so, which version. >>>> >>>> Why would there be any restriction on the versions of syntax which >>>> would achieve the requirement? The original proposal using ```from``` and >>>> other proposals could each be created, tested, specified. >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:37 PM Григорий Карелин <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> True >>>>> >>>>> I think it's possible to find someone who will represent the will of >>>>> community. >>>>> >>>>> At the moment the question is does community have will to add proposed >>>>> sugar to the language, and if so, which version. >>>>> >>>>> ср, 29 мая 2019 г. в 22:30, Oriol _ <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> If you want to add this you will need a champion, see >>>>>> https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#new-feature-proposals >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Oriol >>>>>> >>>>>> El 29/5/19 a les 21:15, Григорий Карелин ha escrit: >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, what does community think? Do we want to have “destructuring >>>>>> picking” sugar in JS and if we do, which syntax looks more attractive? >>>>>> >>>>>> I’d suggest to vote. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Отправлено с мобильного устройства >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> es-discuss mailing >>>>>> [email protected]https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> es-discuss mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> С уважением, >>>>> Карелин Григорий >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> es-discuss mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> С уважением, >>> Карелин Григорий >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >> > > -- > С уважением, > Карелин Григорий > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
