I'm new to this community, so I'd appreciate if you clarify: is that your opinion or is it kind of rule written somewhere?
чт, 30 мая 2019 г. в 09:59, guest271314 <[email protected]>: > > Wouldn't it be better to consolidate the decision? I mean as OP I vote > for `from`, but if majority will say they better like `x.{y, z}` I'll take > it. > > No. There should not be any prohibition as to the additions different > solutions to a single proposal. Neither proposal is "better" right now as > neither have been coded, tested, and if necessary, specified. A simple > majority does not mean correct or complete. The more approaches available > the more ability to compose the code from different perspectives, > outputting the same result; expanding the language both in syntax and reach > as to possible composition, without setting an arbitrary specification to a > single majority at only this point in time. > > The tersest have been able to achieve so far on a single line using an > immediately invoked arrow function and object rest which requires writing > the identifier twice. > > If part of the requirement for the proposal is terse code, following the > pattern of an immediately invoked arrow function if ```=``` operator > between expressions ```()``` the arrow `>` and return value could be > omitted as being designated implicit immediately invoked arrow function > with default return value set from the destructured parameters, or > ```undefined``` set as value of target identifiers, or plain object > ```{}```, resulting in the syntax, within at least an object literal, > possibly preceded by spread syntax, will result in > > ```let obj = {otherData:'other > data',...(({firstName,lastName})=(user.profile)}``` > > being equivalent to > > ```let obj = {otherData:'other > data',...(({firstName,lastName})=>({firstName,lastName}))(user.profile)}``` > > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 6:38 AM Григорий Карелин <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Wouldn't it be better to consolidate the decision? I mean as OP I vote >> for `from`, but if majority will say they better like `x.{y, z}` I'll take >> it. >> >> чт, 30 мая 2019 г. в 06:35, guest271314 <[email protected]>: >> >>> > I think it's possible to find someone who will represent the will of >>> community. >>> >>> Individuals can compose the code right now. >>> >>> > At the moment the question is does community have will to add proposed >>> sugar to the language, and if so, which version. >>> >>> Why would there be any restriction on the versions of syntax which would >>> achieve the requirement? The original proposal using ```from``` and other >>> proposals could each be created, tested, specified. >>> >>> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:37 PM Григорий Карелин <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> True >>>> >>>> I think it's possible to find someone who will represent the will of >>>> community. >>>> >>>> At the moment the question is does community have will to add proposed >>>> sugar to the language, and if so, which version. >>>> >>>> ср, 29 мая 2019 г. в 22:30, Oriol _ <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> If you want to add this you will need a champion, see >>>>> https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#new-feature-proposals >>>>> >>>>> -- Oriol >>>>> >>>>> El 29/5/19 a les 21:15, Григорий Карелин ha escrit: >>>>> >>>>> I agree. >>>>> >>>>> So, what does community think? Do we want to have “destructuring >>>>> picking” sugar in JS and if we do, which syntax looks more attractive? >>>>> >>>>> I’d suggest to vote. >>>>> -- >>>>> Отправлено с мобильного устройства >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> es-discuss mailing >>>>> [email protected]https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> es-discuss mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> С уважением, >>>> Карелин Григорий >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> es-discuss mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> С уважением, >> Карелин Григорий >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > -- С уважением, Карелин Григорий
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
