Any chance that someone can make this change? The MetaMegaProtoUser has functionality (changing password, registering, etc) that our users want. To be honest, if the combination of OpenID and MetaMegaProtoUser leads to conflicts I'd rather have the MetaMegaProtoUser. Is it possible to change the UI for the MetaMegaProtoUser functionality? D.
________________________________ From: David Pollak [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Fri 03.04.2009 18:07 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: MetaMegaProtoUser Usage in ESME On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Hirsch, Richard <[email protected]>wrote: > I've been exploring lift and have found the MetaMegaProtoUser object ( > http://scala-tools.org/scaladocs/liftweb/1.0/net/liftweb/mapper/MetaMegaProtoUser.html) > which actually has tons of functionality out-of-the-box regarding user > registration. > > Could we use this functionality? Either in addition to OpenID or instead of > OpenID? The OpenID stuff sits on top of MetaMegaProtoUser (what moron named this stuff? Oh... right... it was me.) What we need to do is abstract away the authentication method into another table from the user and optionally allow a user to have multiple authentication mechanisms (NTLM, Kerberos, OpenID, username/password). My backlog sucks. > > > D. > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net <http://liftweb.net/> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp
